Yesterday I read an excellent article by James Fallows on How to Save the News in the Atlantic. The article discussed how Google was working to help news organizations monetize their content in the online age. The article prompted me to submit the following letter to the editor:
The ability to quickly find quality content is the primary reason that people use Google, and is good to see that Google is committed to helping professional journalism survive ("How to Save the News" by James Fallows). Journalists provide a large share of the material that draws people to the search engine, both Google news and the main search page. Consumers know that Google (and other search engines like Bing and Yahoo!) provide easy one-stop access to the information they seek on a large variety of topics. In exchange for this convenience, consumers allow Google to run sponsored links above the search results for the small fraction of search queries that are commercially valuable. A good analogy is commercial radio. Radio stations aggregate quality content that consumers want (songs from various artists) in exchange for the right to subject the consumer to the occasional advertisement. The radio versus search engine analogy breaks down, however, when we note that those who create the content that attracts consumers to the radio stations, the songwriters, are compensated for their creations in the form of performance royalties paid by the radio station. The fact that such a performance royalty agreement does not exist between search engines and professional journalists is an accident of history, and need not be the case in the future. Google and other search engines should compensate content providers directly for the right to use their creations.In order to create such a system journalists need to realize that their creations are largely interchangeable from the perspective of Google or the average web surfer. If individual news providers starts charging in some way, the consumers and Google will simply move their attention to free news sites. This is why micro-payments are not the answer. Instead, news organizations need to bargain collectively and require that Google and other search engines pay for the right to index their content. If a large fraction of news organizations were to simultaneously remove their content from Google, it would seriously impact the quality of the Google product (and give Bing a huge advantage if they were to pay for that body of content). In a performance royalty system, news organizations would be payed a small fixed fee each time Google linked to their articles, similar to the way songwriters are compensated via ASCAP when their songs are played on the radio. Google will argue that the legal concept of fair use allows them to aggregate short portions of content from copyrighted sources and therefore prevents such a system from being enforceable, but it is not clear that fair use applies (the creation of the search index requires an entire copy of the document be stored on the Google servers). Additionally, journalists cannot be forced to participate, just as songwriters need not join ASCAP.
Clearly, such a system will not be invented by Google as it is bad for their bottom line. Nonetheless, a performance royalty system would fairly compensate journalists for the value they provide both Google and consumers.
Posted by web design Suisse on June 28, 2010 at 09:23 AM PDT #
Posted by fix credit on September 07, 2010 at 05:28 AM PDT #
Posted by fix credit on March 05, 2011 at 11:49 AM PST #
Posted by Kerosene lamps. on March 18, 2011 at 04:45 PM PDT #
Posted by Furnishings. on March 18, 2011 at 10:11 PM PDT #
Posted by Linens. on March 19, 2011 at 04:56 PM PDT #
Posted by Ikea. on March 20, 2011 at 03:53 PM PDT #
Posted by Built in desk. on March 22, 2011 at 11:20 AM PDT #
Posted by Computer desk. on March 22, 2011 at 11:47 PM PDT #
Posted by Physicians desk reference. on March 23, 2011 at 03:19 PM PDT #
Posted by Pink lap desk. on March 24, 2011 at 03:13 PM PDT #
Posted by White student desk. on March 25, 2011 at 07:47 PM PDT #
Posted by Pali baby furniture. on March 26, 2011 at 06:41 PM PDT #
Posted by Lap desk. on March 27, 2011 at 05:29 AM PDT #
Posted by Sofa works. on March 27, 2011 at 08:23 PM PDT #
Posted by Computer desk. on March 28, 2011 at 02:03 AM PDT #
Posted by Furniture polish liquid uk. on March 28, 2011 at 10:23 AM PDT #
Posted by Bouldvard furniture philadelphia pa. on March 28, 2011 at 07:54 PM PDT #
Posted by Campbell leather furniture. on March 29, 2011 at 07:59 AM PDT #
Posted by Woman in ski goggles. on March 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM PDT #
Posted by Tiger stadium seating chart. on April 08, 2011 at 08:27 AM PDT #
Posted by Henredon furniture. on April 08, 2011 at 07:43 PM PDT #
Posted by Bedrooms. on April 09, 2011 at 02:55 AM PDT #
Posted by Highland park furniture. on April 09, 2011 at 05:22 AM PDT #
Posted by Digital cameras. on April 09, 2011 at 04:57 PM PDT #
Posted by Digital cameras. on April 10, 2011 at 03:49 PM PDT #
Posted by Carol on April 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM PDT #
Posted by Camera digital panasonic. on April 11, 2011 at 02:52 PM PDT #
Posted by Rossignol rebel. on April 12, 2011 at 03:31 PM PDT #
Posted by Beretta 686 forearm. on April 13, 2011 at 04:50 AM PDT #
Posted by S w 686 cs-1. on April 13, 2011 at 05:35 PM PDT #
Posted by Burton baselayers. on April 14, 2011 at 09:21 AM PDT #
Posted by Wilene burton. on April 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM PDT #
Posted by 964 7901 736 686. on April 15, 2011 at 01:43 AM PDT #
Posted by Aerial snowshoes. on April 15, 2011 at 11:37 AM PDT #
Posted by Laquiole rossignol. on April 15, 2011 at 10:50 PM PDT #
Posted by Snowshoe boise. on April 16, 2011 at 09:44 AM PDT #
Posted by 249 51 686 089. on April 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM PDT #
Posted by Rossignol snowboards. on April 17, 2011 at 03:55 AM PDT #
Posted by Chest tap. on July 13, 2011 at 02:58 PM PDT #
Posted by Ikea .ca. on July 14, 2011 at 02:45 PM PDT #
Posted by digital camera review on September 02, 2011 at 08:56 AM PDT #
Posted by Tory Burch Flip Flops on October 14, 2011 at 11:29 PM PDT #
Posted by jordan chaussure on December 16, 2011 at 05:31 PM PST #
Posted by nike free on December 16, 2011 at 05:34 PM PST #